Back In The Good Old Dayz.

The Journey To Great.

The Wherewithal Of A Legend.

Laugh Out Loud.

The Battle For Coca-Cola

The Battle For Coca-Cola
Rages On.

Ain't Nothing Like
The Real Thing, Maybe.

Last Blast Of Cool.

The Death Of Advertising.

Working Twice As Hard

I Don't Mean To Say
I Told You So, But...

Global Cooling

It Is Futile to Resist,

Are Consumers Smarter
Then We Are?.

The Four Great Myths
Of Global Branding.

Mr Bevis Butts Heads
At Mitsubishi

Agility In The Marketplace

Mitsu Who?

The Best Laid Plans
Of Mice And Men.

The Future As I See It.

Dare to Be Great:
The Mad Genius of "The Matrix
"

Some Nerve:

The Boy who Broke My Heart

Mitsubishi's New Marketing Boss
Out Of The Frying Pan.

Too Busy For Temptation

The One True Thing

Concept Is Stronger Than Fact.

I Create, Therefore I Am.

Value Perception In A World
Gone Mad With "Cool"

The Lost Art Of Persuasion

The Future of Advertising
The Brand

 

 

 

Last Blast Of Cool.. As with all good things, with this episode we bring our Ad Hoc Campaign for Coke to a close with the presentation of our group's television spot for the campaign. Six spots were finalists but we chose to present only the one that stood head and shoulders above the rest and represented the kind of work we believe would make the most impact in today's world.


VOLUME
EIGHT
WEDNESDAY
OCTOBER 13,
2004

It has been very rewarding, personally to experience the outpouring of comment and sentiment expressed by readers of this column and others on the efforts of the group.

What is the best school for getting an education in advertising- Bobby R. Denver

Harvard B-School -HW

It has been our objective to stimulate discussion and discourse on the messaging path taken by what may well be one of the greatest brands on Earth.

I work for Coke and I wanted to tell you that they tested your "Cool American" campaign and it scored miserably. - Anon, Atlanta I work for Pepsi and I wanted to tell you that we created the "Cool American" campaign just so Coke would waste their time testing it while we got national exposure on Apprentice for Pepsi Edge..- HW

Yes, we have been contacted by at least two of the many agencies on Coke's roster to join in their efforts ( we will decide in the next few days.) Yes we have been encouraged by present and former TCCC employees and stockholders, world wide. In each and every case, their comments, suggestions and support has made this exercise a joyful undertaking. No, we have not been contacted directly or officially by Coke Management.

Yes, it has been confirmed that they are aware of the campaign, which was after all, our prime objective.

The most persistent critique of the campaign has been whether or not "flag waving" will do anything to move a product that is, as described by many, "colored sugar water." In response, I offer this. First and foremost, the only "Flag" we are waving with this campaign is the flag of "Brand Coca-Cola." We perceive the Coca-Cola Classic product as both refreshingly cool and uniquely American. Secondly, this product is infinitely more than "Colored Sugar Water" as Band-Aid Brand Adhesive Bandages are more than strips of plastic and patches of gauze.

A bottle of Coca-Cola is a thing of beauty to behold. Put one up to the sunlight. As a pure product form, it is a work of art. The Coca-Cola glass is perhaps the most photographed, retouched, spectacularly lit product representation of all time. I personally have watched as the great Henry Sandbank ( perhaps the greatest tabletop photographer that ever lived) hand-etched the water drops on a Coke glass with a secret formula of glycerin and water. When I see that amazing caramel-colored rainbow filtered through that pale green bottle, something in the back of my throat starts sending signals to my brain to check my pocket for change and the nearby vicinity for a tall foamy one. Such is the power of Brand Coca Cola. To paraphrase the words of the Genie in Disney's Aladdin, "You Ain't Never Had A Friend Like Coke."

In essence, no product-centric advertising could ever do justice to the experience of an ice cold bottle of Coke on a scorching hot day. That is why the great Coca-Cola advertising has always depended upon the icons of borrowed interest to deliver on the product promise. Football players, hilltops, endless singing smiling happy faces, tragically hip, slackers in their pitifully shallow moments of glory. Irrelevant bookends for a product shot that can never do justice to a product that defies description.

"Double-Think" didn't consider venturing down that well-worn path. Throughout the "A Cool American" campaign we have attempted to take the "Product as Hero" mantra to another place all together. In print, it was the individuality of the Brand and those who personified a few steps beyond the perception of "those arrogant yanks." Television is the chosen arena for Global Superbrands. In everything we did, our criteria was the same. If it looked, sounded or felt like a Coca-Cola Commercial, we had not accomplished our stated mission.

More than a hundred ideas and executions were conceived, examined and rejected. We looked at the work of the agencies that were competing and said to ourselves which of these executions would they approve. Once we eliminated those, that left us with a field of 14. We did flash demos of the 14 and exposed them to a global reader panel and asked them to rank the spots 1-14. Last week we took the top six and lived with them for a week. Monday morning I polled everybody for their favorite two. One spot was the clear winner, hands down. To view it click here.

Making Things Matter. A great deal of attention was paid a few months back to the firestorm created by an article in the Harvard Business Review penned by Nicholas G. Carr, editor-at-large for HBR and author of "The Digital Enterprise," HBR Press 2001. The article, entitled "IT Doesn't Matter," portends that Information Technology has reached the point of ubiquity and as such is about to become commoditzed in the same way the railroads and the electrical current grids were half a century ago.

Carr's premise was that IT software, hardware and infrastructure no longer have the power to create competitive advantage in and of themselves. His support for this position was that since everybody has IT capabilities, IT products in and of themselves no longer have the power to transform or even effect the value proposition of a given enterprise.

In the words of Thomas A. Stewart, the Editor of HBR, the article, "takes one side of the argument that is undeniably urgent and important to business leaders." At the core of this side of the argument is Mr. Carr's statement that, "No one would dispute that information technology has become the backbone of commerce. The point is however,does technology still have the potential for differentiating one company from the pack?

The premise of the HBR essay was that a technology's strategic potential, inexorably diminishes as it becomes accessible and affordable to all. Of course this article raised a groundswell of debate with some of the most influential names in technology chiming in to assure the world that the rumors of Technology's demise had been greatly over-exaggerated by the HBR article.

But even so, one of the quotes, side barred in the article, gives pause for concern. Not because it comes from the world of academia, but because it comes from one of the recognized "great thinkers" of the IT world itself. In an address before the 2003 World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Bill Joy, the Chief Scientist and co-founder of Sun Microsystems posed the question, "What if the reality is that (business) people have already bought most of the stuff they want to own?"

Given the question of Mr. Joy, the larger issue may be "What if the reality is that people have already bought most of the stuff they want to own?" Clearly, the benchmark of any successful sales effort begins and ends with a company's marketing strategy. The only product a customer is interested in buying is a product that will enhance that customer's quality of life. Period. This means that instead of positioning their product as "The Next New Thing" marketeers have to refocus on the enormous challenge of meeting the unmet wants, needs and desires of their potential customers.

Right now the strategic value of product innovation is laboring under the weight of over-inflated or broken promises in the life experiences of their customer base. The backlash of this reality is the current household ( as well as business) mantra of "Do more, with less." Industry's response to this challenge has lead to "commodity pricing," in which a decade of brand equity and preference is being washed away in a sea of price comparisons and impossible margins. When the dust settles in these price wars, Marketing Managers may find themselves faced with. "No thanks. We'll make do with what we've got."

No place will this be more pronounced then in the telecom sector. As it stands now, people hate this industry with a passion. Rapacious business practices,"public be screwed" pricing scams and dinner-time sales calls have conspired with cutthroat profit margins and a deteriorating infrastructure to make this one of the most detested industries on the planet.

That's why the team at "Double-Think" will be retraining their Coca-Cola sharpened creative skills to the task of repositioning a wireless service provider. The lucky benificiary of this new wave of pro-bono brainstorming? ALLTEL, the Little Rock, Ark, wireless-telecommunications provider that spent $100 million trying to surface in the Midwest and has just named Frank O' Mara evp of marketing. Our first task will be to find out exactly what it takes to make a "commodity service" like your telephone matter from one provider to another.

The Hunt for Bread In October. Many of the people who wrote asked me to provide them with an introduction to the agent I alluded to a while back, who allowed me to walk away from my staff position on Madison Avenue and set up a lucrative practice as a freelance "Brain For Rent." If she could do that for me, she could obviously do that for them. I actually felt bad in telling them that the legendary Judy Wald has been retired for some years now and the woman for whom the term "Head Hunter" was coined had sold the Judy Wald Agency to two of her longtime employees and in doing so changed the nature of "talent acquisition" in the ad world forever.

But the issue of search firms being ( or not being ) responsive to job candidates was an interesting topic. So I called up a few friends in high places and asked them to give me a heads up when they posted a job with a search firm. My intention was to wait until I had four or five of these "Job Tips" in hand that were placed with the five largest placement companies and try different techniques to see which worked best in enlisting a quick response. I'm not going to reveal the names of all five agents because I told the people who gave me the Job Tips I would only mention the agency that was most responsive. But I will give you the five strategies in the order of least responsive first.

The Cold Resume Drop. Surprisingly, this technique of simply firing off an e-mail resume to an online job posting on Monster, Craigslist or HotList is how most folks do their job hunting these days. I think that people who do this sort of thing are totally myopic about how the system works; how many resumes actually show up in people's mailboxes and what their competition is like. I actually put a blind ad for one of my clients recently. They wanted to hire an art director with at least 5 years of experience. I posted the ad on Craigslist in Los Angeles, San Francisco and New York. Each anonymous address fed into a separate HotMail account. Within one 24 hour period these are the responses by city. Los Angeles 563, San Francisco 349, New York 422. Obviously, the Test Resume I sent to a New York City search firm that advertised in the NY Art Directors Club Job Bank got no response in the five business days I afforded the test.

The Cold Resume Drop and Telephone Follow-up. Every want ad I've ever seen says "No Phone Calls Please." To me, that means most people won't call, which means I won't be confronted with a busy signal. From the search firms point of view that phone call positions the candidate as a non-responsive jerk who can't or won't follow orders and is therefore a none starter. Your call has to have a spin, to avoid such a stigma. My spin was "I'm just calling to get the name of the recruiter because my portfolio is insured but I have to give the messenger service the exact person who will be responsible to be adequately covered." I get the name, I call back that afternoon, give the name, get shunted to voicemail and give the spiel that I'm up for another job, but theirs sounds much more in line with my qualifications. If I can just get a quick yes or no review I'll know whether to stall the first offer. I also drop the hint that if I get their job I'll tell them about the job I turned down along with the contact person and hiring decision maker. Response time: 3 days.

Automated Resume Foil. One of the jobs was through a corporate recruiter in a Global 100 company. My first step was to determine whether this company ran all of their inbound resumes through an automated profiling system. That was simple to determine. I called the company, asked to speak to the IT department. Told them I was from IBM and I wanted to arrange a "proof of concept" meeting for our new Websphere automated resume/applicant screening solution. The automatic response was that they were perfectly satisfied with their present HR screening app and if that changes they will contact their existing IBM sales contact. That told me they had such a program in place. My next step was to take their recruitment ad and rephrase it slightly to reflect my qualifications, which were actually their qualifications in drag and send it into the machine. Response time: 2.5 days.

 

 

MARKETERS FROM
THE FOLLOWING COMPANIES
READ MADISON AVENEW:

OGILVY & MATHER
MULLEN ADVERTISING
THE MARTIN AGENCY
TBWA CHAIT/DAY
GSD&M
YOUNG&RUBICAM
McCANN-ERICKSON
LEO BURNETT USA
PUBLICIS
FOOTE,CONE,BELDING
GREY ADVERTISING
HILL, HOLIDAY
LANDOR ASSOCIATES
MODEM MEDIA
BUMBLE WARD & ASSOCIATES
WPP GROUP

ADRANTS
NEW YORK TIMES
CHICAGO TRIBUNE
NEW YORK OBSERVER
BRANDWEEK
ADWEEK
LAS VEGAS REVIEW JOURNAL
DOW JONES
LEXIS-NEXIS
COX NEWSPAPERS
PUBLIC INTEREST NETWORK
MONSTER WORLDWIDE
HOUGHTON MIFFIN COMPANY

BANK OF AMERICA
NATIONSBANK
THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL GROUP
INDYMAC BANCORP
GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE
KMPG/PEAT MARWICK
DEAN WITTER
VERISIGN

INVESTORS BANK & TRUST
AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING
MUTUAL LIFE OF CANADA
MUTUAL OF OMAHA
RELIASTAR FINANCIAL


GENERAL MOTORS
MERCEDES-B ENZ OF N.A.

FORD MOTOR CO
NISSAN NORTH AMERICA
CHRYSLER MOTORS CORP


MICROSOFT CORP
SUN MICROSYSTEMS
CISCO SYSTEMS
IBM CORPORATION
PULITZER TECHNOLOGIES
DIEBOLD
HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS


ESTEE LAUDER COMPANIES
THE LIMITED, INC.
TIFFANY CO.

BOEING
AMACO CORPORATION

20TH CENTURY FOX
DIRECTV
VISABLE WORLD, INC.
VIACOM INTERNATIONAL
UNIVERSAL STUDIOS
DISNEY WORLDWIDE SERVICES,
INTERNATIONAL CREATIVE MANAGEMENT
CAA
HOLLYWOOD GOWER CENTERH
SCREENVISION
EMERILS HOMEBASE
BARNES & NOBLE.
FANDANGO
ELECTRIC LIGHTWAVE

EARTHLINK, INC
TIME WARNER TELECOM
XO COMMUNICATIONS
UUNET TECHNOLOGIES
VERIZON

DELTA AIR LINES
S.C. JOHNSON WAX
MERCK & CO.
KAISER PERMIANENTE
CANADIAN MENTAL HEALTH ASSN
STARBUCKS COFFEE CO
THE PROCTER AND GAMBLE
COMPANY
SCHERING-PLOUGH CORP.
RCN CORPORATION

And You.

 
Past Relationship/ Distant. If somebody made money selling your head once, chances are they can do it again. Search firms are always on the lookout for former placements because they can always add on that personal endorsement tag to the submission that will invariably give them a leg up over the competition. Oh yes. Didn't you know? Nobody lists their jobs with just one search firm any more. They hope for multiple responses so that if they get the same candidate from two search organizations, they can pit one against the other and negotiate a lower fee. Response time: 2 days.

Past Relationship/Recent. Recruiters are extremely well insulated from the multitude of job seekers out there. So if you get the opportunity to establish even the most casual relationship with an administrative or management member in a search firm, even if you're not in the job market at the time, do so by any means possible. The winner in this "Responsiveness Test" was Creative Circle. Now, I'm in the business of divining opportunities, so I am a religious reader of at least 8 online want ad sites a day. This practice lets me know who is looking for Marketing Directors and that is the first warning that an account is about to go into play. Some months ago Creative Circle was looking to hire a recruiter and ran an ad on Craigslist. Naturally they posted the e-mail address of a member of their management team so as not to have the recruiter candidates lumped in with the blizzard of job seeker responses that fill their mail boxes every day. "Ah-ha," says I.

Knowing that I might need this "back door" to one of the largest creative search firms, one day, I sent off a playful commentary to their ad for a new recruiter, and pinged them on "responsiveness." Unexpectedly, I got an equally playful response right back. As luck would have it, Creative Circle had a job posted during the period of this test that fit right into the profile of the other four jobs. I advantaged the earlier contact, referenced the prior contact, gave a few career highlights and sent it off. Again, within the hour, I had a response from the manager who stated that he would have the recruiter contact me. 24 hours later I had no response from the recruiter and pinged the manager. Miffed at my aggressive tone of voice, he promptly put me in my place with his response. I promptly wrote off Creative Circle as yet another burned bridge until, to my surprise I got a note from said recruiter sent at 7:15am on a Monday morning with a smiley face and an explanation that they had receieved more than 100 apps for the job on Friday and the recruiter assigned to screen them only worked a half day. In my book that made Creative Circle the winner in the responsiveness test for a total initial response time of 33 minutes.

Stay Tuned.

 
       

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THE FINE PRINT

1. All comments, images, ideas and thoughts on Madison AveNew are property of their authors, reproduction without the author’s permission is strictly prohibited.
2. By sending comments you give us permission to use them in our monthly Retrospect to highlight the best discussions of each month.
3. Keep in mind that your comments could potentially be used in varied Madison AveNew promotional pieces (we will contact you if such is the case).
4. Madison AveNew reserves the right to delete any comment deemed offensive or unnecessary.
5.All material originated for MadisonAvenew.com is ©2005 Smart Communications, Inc. All Rights Are Reserved. Reprint rights available by request.