|
What was evident in this transition (during the mid 70's) was that the large agency networks had given up the idea of investing in the creative process. Senior creatives that had been responsible for turning entire corporate monoliths around were now walking the streets, unemployed. In their place were three younger, cheaper "creatives" who generally didn't have a clue about the great work that had preceded them. And didn't seem to care.
That was the beginning of the end of Madison Avenue's leadership of the "creative revolution." Within a few short years that leadership would migrate to Hollywood, then Silicon Valley, never to return.
Meanwhile, back on Madison Ave., agencies had discovered a new love. Going public.
Now these companies had "shareholder value" to assure. Management turned its attention from making great advertising that had the power to change the fortunes of their client's companies, to counting the number of pencils used. The love of advertising had migrated into the love of fiduciary oversight. Instead of the work looking good, the emphasis was on the quarterly numbers looking good. Intellectual capital was out. Capital gains were in.
And so it was that the work of Madison Avenue began to become more and more irrelevant to the process of building shareholder value for their clients. So it was that the idea of the agency as "marketing partner" fell by the wayside and the status of "agency of record" went the way of the buggy whip.
The "kids" who had been brought in to "save" the creative mandate of the agencies did not bring a love of advertising with them. They brought in a love of film, music, television, fashion and everything else they could borrow to create interest in their tired strategies and shallow selling propositions.
The web came (and went) creating yet another series of distractions and siphoning off even more "love" from the creative process. Now ad makers didn't even have to admit to working in advertising. They could allude to being in "New Media" instead.
So now advertising is left with nobody to love it. The press is taking Super Bowl Ads to task for being lackluster. Clients are going everywhere but Madison Ave. for their next "big idea."
So now what? Where do we go to get us some love? Well, I think we can take a leaf from the world of technology. Look at the spectacular growth of Linux and the "love" that drives the open source movement. Look at the phenomena of "shareware" and the love of programmers who create applications for the sheer joy of it, not the profit of it.
Open source marketing that takes advantage of the "creative commons" movement attempts to create a counterbalance to the overly restrictive copyright regime that makes it virtually impossible to include or quote any material for commercial use without enumeration if that material is copyrighted. According to the creative commons movement, some rights are reserved to build a layer of reasonable copyright protection. But editorial use is fair game.
Open-source marketing enlists the audience to take a message, an image, or a jingle and "improve" it by creating derivative works. It encourages consumers to not just consume and critique, but to engage, improve, and redistribute improvements if the original doesn't work or measure up. Obviously to engage in such behavior these "uberconsumers" have to "love" the products whose images they are inclined to enhance.
In our own way we have contributed significantly to this movement with our own "Cool American" campaign for Coca-Cola Classic. My motive for initiating the campaign (other than being a TCCC shareholder) was a life-long love of the product. And a career-long respect and (in some cases) participation in creating advertising for the brand. The media picked up the "Cool American" campaign and it gained worldwide exposure. Which could only benefit brand Coca-Cola. And Coke brand Sprite picked up the campaign and used it with slight changes in Asia.
These days it has become very difficult for creative practitioners to have enough time on a brand to develop a love of the products they work on. There also doesn't seem to be enough tenure within the average agency client relationship to develop the brand culture needed by creative teams and clients to fully develop outstanding creative solutions that come from the product and not some borrowed interest pop icon or hit tune.
Many agencies are also suffering from revolving door creative departments and an abundance of outsourcing to freelance teams, which is a deterrent to creatives learning to "love" what they do. Fear is not fertile ground for "love" to grow.
Now our industry is fighting for its life. Clients are openly criticizing the lack of inspiration and innovation in their agencies and soliciting new "ideas" from anybody who has them. The writing is on the wall for advertising and I'm afraid it's not a love letter. Let's hope it's not a Dear John.
Stay
tuned.
|