|
What I experienced was so subtle and so insidious It took me a full ten minutes of reflection to even come to grips with it. At first, I just went to the home page and clicked on the random video clips that show up at each landing. Not sorted by any specific type or category, it gave me a fair overview of what was in store for me, should I continue to hang out.
Then I decided to take the next step and type in a search topic. Here's where the dynamic gets interesting. I typed in the word "trains," certainly because I have an interest in the subject matter, but also because I know there is a vast amount of video shot on trains floating around on the web.
Well, folks, Google had managed to round up 196 video clips on trains. Everything from a "train" wreck from 1932 to the "training" of covert operatives by the CIA. That's what got me. I went through all 196 pages. That's how curious I was about a topic that I had an interest in. A topic that was MEANINGFUL to me.
In effect, the video fare that Google Video is serving up is a global sampling of the visions and images of a wide spectrum of film makers and videographers on an amazing variety of topics. Next, I went to "bullfighting." Four videos were all that were available. My favorite Jazz musician "Miles Davis" yielded 25 topics, non of which had anything to do with Miles (including the Archive of American Television interview with Jane Wyatt, Alan Alda and Mike Wallace, provided by the Academy of Television Arts & Sciences Foundation.)
Even so, I was still compelled to keep feeding in subject matter to see what was available for viewing. On and on I went, coming finally to "advertising." This search yielded 368 topics. Everything from brilliantly executed "virals" to abysmally realized "templates" for retail automotive commercials. Now the content became truly compelling as student projects and art films, all based upon the tv commercial paradigm, came spilling forth.
Again I found myself driven by curiosity from page to page. That's when I began to realize how this emerging entertainment form could be easily exploited by advertisers. Short films on a wide variety of topics that included branding references could be easily deployed in each interest category.
Instead of spending a million bucks on producing a single network tv spot, ONE HUNDRED 1- to 2-minute topical films on 10 popular subjects could be produced and "distributed" via Google Video.
Obviously, a million dollar investment to dominate the dawn of a powerful new web medium is marginal at best. Google Video customers can currently buy and rent sports programs (like NBA), prime time and classic CBS shows (CSI online anyone?), music videos, ITN news, cartoons and childrens’ TV, movies from independent producers and film makers and more. “For video producers and anyone with a video camera, Google Video will give you a platform to publish to the entire Google audience in a fast, free and seamless way,” according to Larry Page, Google’s co-founder and President of Products.
Of course, the fatal flaw in the beta version of Google Video is so basic as to be inconceivable. The company that has become so synonymous with world-wide web search so as to be considered a verb ("Googled") is not currently intending to "search" the web for video content. A web-wide search engine for video files is not on their horizon. In fact it is quite obvious they intend to focus on sales rather than search, taking a page from the Apple primer on pod-casting.
This will leave an Achilles heel for competitive incursion into their probable monopoly. Look for the Ikagami-powered MSN Search giant or Yahoo megabrand to exploit this flaw, in the interest of offering a wider selection of video content as a competitive advantage.
In any case, the movie and TV industry should feel the heat from these developments. Independent producers may in the future bypass these companies altogether, splitting the profits with Google and other online video platforms instead. Of course, they will miss the millions of dollars of promotional support the majors can throw at a film or a tv show.
Video prices on Google Video are set by the content provider. The copyright owners decide whether the files should be given copy protection – giving them even greater control over their distribution. And the Web has proven that there are other ways of building an audience than giving away the store to a major player just for distribution. Can you say "MP3" boys and girls?
The greatest challenge will be the ways in which the massive potential audiences for Google Video will be accessed by brand marketers. All of the "old school" rules and sensibilities will no longer apply. Google Video is shaping up to be the first major proving ground and frontier for the Post-Advertising Era. The land grab has already begun.
Stay
tuned.
|